Named local schemes and plans, with the responsible body and the latest stage established by the source checked. A proposal, funding announcement and completed project are different things.
Stirling city centre, university and college corridors
Walk, Cycle, Live Stirling
Completed routes connect the city centre, railway station, university and college for walking, wheeling and cycling.
Council reports routes delivered · evidence dated 2026-10-08
Responsible body: Stirling Council
Latest evidence: The council describes two completed routes and over 6.5 kilometres of new corridors. Completion is distinct from demonstrating changes in travel behaviour.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- No official project-to-ward mapping has been verified; no ward allocation is inferred from the city name.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Achievements and delivered projects →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Extend Stirling’s usable walking network towards southern communities →
How to track delivery →Burghmuir Road, Bannockburn, St Ninians and Glasgow Road
City Centre South walking and cycling routes
Proposals connect communities south of the centre through St Ninians to the existing route network.
Early public engagement and proposals · evidence dated 2026-10-08
Responsible body: Stirling Council
Latest evidence: The council is developing four routes and seeking local feedback before final designs. Delivery funding is competitive and is not confirmed for every proposal.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- No official project-to-ward mapping has been verified; no ward allocation is inferred from the city name.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Active Travel live projects →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Extend Stirling’s usable walking network towards southern communities →
How to track delivery →Durieshill, between Bannockburn and Plean in the wider Stirling council area
Durieshill school and community campus
A new school has detailed planning approval for 292 pupils, plus provision for 18 pupils needing additional support. It is part of the wider Durieshill development, not a completed school.
Detailed school planning permission approved in June 2026; opening not verified · evidence dated 2026-06-24
Responsible body: Stirling Council and Barratt and David Wilson Homes
Latest evidence: The 23 June decision covers a ten-classroom school and community facilities. A larger future school and nursery still need further applications. The wider development’s homes and facilities are planned over many years.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- No verified current ward footprint is assigned. The named site or council-wide remit is not proof of benefits to every ward.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Approval for new Primary School and community campus at Durieshill →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Open supporting services as Durieshill grows →
Make room for homes people can afford →
How to track delivery →What this local evidence covers
0 of 7 wards
Have at least one valid census comparison with the whole council. Missing measures stay visible.
Read the neighbourhood evidence →3 reviewed plans and projects
3 have a source-dated stage; 0 have some funding evidence; 0 have some cost evidence. These counts do not prove that funding or costs are complete.
Check each project →0 verified ward links
Project locations cannot be treated as a map of who benefits. Each record explains any verified ward association.
Read the sources and limits →What is still missing
The reviewed local schemes are a selected evidence collection, not a complete council capital programme.
Current service capacity, incomes, waiting lists, school demand and project outcomes need additional verified local evidence before firm claims can be made.
Project locations have not been matched to official ward boundaries. No ward-specific delivery claims are inferred.
Costs, funding and benefits are only reported where the selected official evidence states them; blank fields are not zero.
Durieshill is a development in the wider council area, not the city centre. School completion, current site progress and a school-specific final cost have not been verified; wider infrastructure funding is not relabelled as the school budget.
